Watch now (123 mins) | There sometimes seems to be a bug that suppresses the picture-in-picture (PIP) feature when accessing this website indirectly through a link.
That’s why I keep saying if religion was good for mankind they would have it buried so deep you would never know anything about it and if it came to the surface, they would call it a conspiracy theory
Where can I watch Part 2 of this conference? I couldn’t not agree with you more and I am finding it fascinating how you explain what I’ve been trying to say for so long.
My name is Dennis, and I only provide transcriptions of Mark Passio's work. I am NOT Mark. I add extra videos and brief commentary, and perhaps that is what you refer to? If so, I will be finishing part 2 probably later today. In the meantime, you can check out all three parts on Mark's website, whatonearthishappening.com
Check later today, and I should have part 2 done, with added videos/commentary!
Great. I finished part 2 and added lots of extra videos and such, that seemed to fit what Mark was talking about. Some are very long, but let me know what you think. Hope you enjoy my other substack too.
After keeping my distance from everyone, I formed an intuition that perhaps, mark passio is just another flawed human being who has some knowledge, but his knowledge is still full of holes, and I need to go far beyond him if I want to improve my life first and then try to improve the lives of others.
1. Most people who consumed hundreds of mark passio's episodes are still broken, lazy, and ineffective.
2. While I scanned his episodes, I noticed that he spends a lot of time on being angry and bashing others for being lazy, cowardly, or something and on talking about various housekeeping topics like upcoming events, ARK, and so on instead of covering new grounds.
3. Because he didn't value other people's time in his episodes, I ran out of time before he taught everything he wanted people to know.
He seems legit, but he's probably also stuck at a level of knowledge and a level of personal development.
It's difficult to find content creators who are legit and value other people's time by compressing their contents as much as possible into the least amount of materials.
I guess his entire contents could be condensed down to 30 20-minute episodes or less if I try.
He also lacks information on "real" personal capability development. He focused too much on the collective side which is very slow to change. Changing individual is a lot faster. This is why people are still ineffective after consuming hundreds of his episodes.
His major focus is to pressure audience into publishing contents about morality and natural law. However, he does that without turning audience into more effective human beings.
Perhaps, I should teach people how to move up to better positions in life in addition to morality and whatever natural law is. And, I shall do that very efficiently in the least amount of time before people run out of time.
In a warfare, positioning yourself matters. If you are stuck in north korea or gaza as a poor peasant, publishing contents probably won't help. Perhaps, you need to move to mexico, south korea, or USA first before starting the moral education. I'd tell people to first move up in life and entrench themselves in better positions.
In a warfare, you have to flow like water and move to better positions. In practice, that can look like having multiple international bank accounts and multiple international companies and multiple passports and having more than enough money to operate smoothly.
Mark passio just tells people to start the work now even if their position is terrible and unsustainable.
The problem is, the system won't allow you to "move up to better positions in life" unless you consistently violate morality and natural law. So, by the time you have money and leisure time to teach what you don't practice, nobody wants to. It just won't happen. The controllers manipulate their system well.
The real difficulty is that it's difficult to launch a business into a stable orbit in the first place.
You can scam people, but scamming your way to wealth isn't exactly easy, either. I also wouldn't advocate scamming people.
And, you don't have to do immoral things to run a stable business. You don't even need to become very rich. You just need more than enough for stability.
Mike Adams, the founder of health ranger store, is a rich businessman who does moral education some of the times. He agrees with mark passio on morality. He didn't do anything immoral to become rich.
Becoming rich is mostly about hard work and being useful to others. Scamming your way to wealth isn't sustainable and isn't easy. The ruling class somehow pulled off the immoral art of wealth, but the evil way of earning money isn't easy, either.
The real difficulty here is in defeating laziness and becoming an effective human being. Show me a man who has done what he's supposed to do everyday for many years, and he cannot be broke. Such a man is a rarity nowadays. Once you overcome your own obvious flaws, becoming rich and kind of free is not that difficult. The real scarcity is in will power and intelligence. Very few people have will power and intelligence.
You think you can't become rich morally because you lack imagination and have limiting beliefs.
The controllers aren't perfect human beings who always maintain perfect control over everyone. They don't have total control. They don't control everything. The degree of control they possess is still impressive, but it isn't total or perfect. When you supposedly have 8~9 billion people on earth, it's impossible to maintain total control. That's why they are trying to reduce population.
The control system is patchy and jurisdictional and not fully integrated. It is imperfect and will remain so. The control system is also subject to change over time. It isn't an un-defeatable god-like being. Over time, it can become stronger or weaker.
The controllers are powerful, but they aren't as powerful as the conspiracy theorists think they are.
I'd say it's a matter of degrees, a sliding scale of immorality to become rich and successful. Mike Adams seems genuinely more decent than most, but he still must pay taxes to support the war machine or he would be in jail. He still must fund government repression of all with those taxes, while enjoying some more relative freedom/success from his hard work. I don't disparage his general decency or hard work, as he has done much more than most.
And I understand it, because we all feel that we must submit to theft at the barrel of a gun, but we rationalize that if we stay out of jail, we can do more to raise moral awareness about the wider issues. Nonetheless, we must do wrong to promote what is right, because current reality is less than ideal. Everybody must decide for themselves to what degree they choose to compromise, but we all compromise. Can the system ever meaningfully change under such conditions?
Good luck with trying to do moral education in a prison cell.
Why is being forced to pay tax at the threat of a gun point evil? I don't think it is evil.
This is just impractical and impossible. If you refuse to pay tax, you will be either imprisoned or "killed". You know they are willing to kill you to enforce the smallest man-made laws.
We need to fight the war spiritually by publishing contents.
We can't "yet" fight the war physically by not paying tax or by attacking police stations with any weapons we have at hand.
Mark passio is forced to pay tax. You are forced to pay tax. We all are forced to pay tax.
On the other hand, we are not voluntarily helping evildoers and are not initiating direct harm on other beings.
If we are gladly donating money to evildoers, that would be a different story.
What are you realistically going to do? Be imprisoned or killed this year? How does that help anyone?
Lots of people around mark passio told me to not have a job or run a business, or to not pay tax. None of that can be put in practice. That's why I decided to keep distance from them. Let's focus on what can be actually done sustainably.
Without practicality and sustainability, the movement will be killed in this century.
You prove my point. Rationalizing and justifying, according to our own understanding. The lazy person can do the same, and what right do we have to judge them then? Throwing rocks while living in a glass house?
No, it's not evil to give my money to an armed thug who confronts me in a dark alley. I turn over the money, to hopefully avoid getting harmed. That is not evil, just self-preservation, and doing what is practical and possible, for the situation. However, the thug uses those funds to now go do true evil, and although that is not my intent or desire, that is the practical reality and truth of the situation.
That's why the 1776 American revolution got physical, but the low state of awareness then (...and probably even more now...) guaranteed that it was just a matter of time before we got to this current point. Without massive awareness and MASS awareness and UNITY on the fundamentals of natural law (...like for example NOBODY has the right to steal and NOBODY should submit to it...) then it seems that it can only be practiced sporadically and haphazardly on an individual level, to the degree you want to put your safety in jeopardy.
Bottom-line: if nobody can think of a better system to replace the system, meaningful change will always be small and inconsistent.
Let's suppose that I sacrificed myself by not paying tax at all and perhaps even by attacking police stations.
What can I possibly achieve by doing these actions? The only thing I am going to achieve is to rot in prison or die without changing the collective side.
You can call it rationalizing and justifying.
This is why I decided to maintain distance from people around mark passio. At least, mark passio admitted that we are forced to pay tax in order to fight the war spiritually by publishing contents. People around mark passio are even less practical than mark passio. At least, mark passio had a minimal sense of practicality.
Mark passio often complains that people don't follow his lead. What makes you think people are going to be influenced by people around mark passio if the people around mark passio are even less practical than mark passio himself?
Nothing is not going anywhere until people admit impossible plans are indeed impossible.
We are not God who can afford to just do banzai attacks all day everyday without considering strategies. We are imperfect finite beings who can only make imperfect decisions.
I never fell for the New Age Movement. As a Christian it went against what I believed. Now I question a lot of things I was taught as a Christian. I trust Christ as the truth, I trust He cares for me, I trust He gives me wisdom to discern the Truth, I trust He is the creative essence that brings us all together, who are in Him (the creator truth).
Yes and Mark often talks about Jesus (...in a "disguised" way...) when he talks about serving the Truth. Anytime he says Truth, I sub in Jesus, who said He was the way, the Truth, and the life. I am not so literal on the Bible anymore, as I think in terms of parable, metaphor, allegory, symbols, archetypes, etc....
Esoteric interpretation always has personal application this way, to inwardly "drink the blood of Christ and eat His body" when you can apply metaphors to your own heart and inward experience. Outward exoteric "literalism" is often nonsensical and doesn't fit individual circumstances and situations. For example, does "turn the other cheek" make sense, when Epstein wants to rape, torture, murder my child in a Satanic ritual? Nah, the real God would want me to send such a person directly to Him, as quickly as possible, for proper judgement & correction. I would just introduce such a person to the true God and let the Lord do the rest. :-)
The guy's video sounds confusing, as I'm not a financial scam expert. Is he your AI? It will still take time to do all this and it sounds scammy, intentionally confusing, to herd people.
Thanks, but I wasn't on youtube back in 2013. :-) As I mention in the main intro (https://substack.com/@whatonearthishappening), which you might NOT have read, I am NOT Mark Passio. I took his media seminar and decided to make his work more available to readers. My name is actually Dennis.
Thank you Dennis. I appreciate that somehow I didn't see the complete title even though it's right there it may be my migraine issues. Dennis promoting... 🙏🏽🤔
NOTE: The person above deleted their own comment. I, Dennis, the creator of this substack did NOT delete their post. That person can be found at https://trustchristorgotohell.substack.com/ and the substack name explains everything. That person's initial comment was about how Mark Passio was still a "Satanist pig", but s/he had ZERO evidence for such claims and could not stand my challenge.
---START OF MY INITIAL RESPONSE---
I've learned that one can make that claim of ANYBODY and ALWAYS spin at least SOME evidence to make it appear that way. Here is a video debunking David Icke: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UyOf0NrA4ZM&t=1s and it's interesting. Some good points. I still listen to Icke and I'm even reading his latest book, "The Roadmap". I'm careful NOT to worship personalities or let my guard down 100%, with anybody, because the controllers are very tricky. And besides, we're ALL human and can be sincere but sincerely wrong!
So, bottom-line is: do you have a good case to make as to why Mark Passio is still a Satanist? If so, I'll willing to consider it. If not, then you are full of hot air. Most people just like to judge, make accusations with ZERO evidence, and then run away when challenged to prove their case. I suspect you are one of these.
I doubt that you can make as good a case against Mark as I did, from personal experience, in this post here: https://www.whatonearthishappening.wtf/p/what-on-earth-is-happening-with-mark. And yet I still digest Mark's material as cautiously as Icke's, taking what resonates as truth, as they both have a lot of truth, IMHO. And then I discard the rest. I also posted that critique about Mark in his own media telegram group, which all the other students saw, and Mark's friends like Will Keller, etc.... and yet Will was able to see past such and give me a compliment in this post: https://www.whatonearthishappening.wtf/p/will-kellers-book-recommendations
Stephana, from the above post, was also mature enough to be able to talk like an adult with me, in this video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9ZURAF_CUrs&t=1s and Stephana and I are mature enough to continue to be able to collaborate. In fact, we are planning to do a livestream next week and suggest you check out Stephana's promo link here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fx1m48d6oGg
So yeah, are you a mature adult about your accusation or just gonna run away?
NOTE: The person above deleted their own comment. I, Dennis, the creator of this substack did NOT delete their post. That person can be found at https://trustchristorgotohell.substack.com/ and the substack name says it all. That person's initial comment was about how Mark Passio was still a "Satanist pig", but s/he had ZERO evidence for such claims and could not stand my challenge. I had intended to leave the comment for historical reasons.
---START OF MY SUBSEQUENT RESPONSE---
Uh-huh, like I thought, ZERO evidence from personal experience with Mark, unlike my post where I interacted with Mark personally and had honest criticism. You probably didn't even check out those posts, as quick judgers like to wing it and free style, since they have NOTHING, except vague symbolism accusations. You obviously don't understand how flexible symbolism is, and in a duality realm, even negative symbolism can be inverted in positive ways, in light occultism fashion, because intentions behind things is important. I'm sure you can read Mark's mind and know his intentions!
Anybody can throw around phrases like repent and trust Christ, etc... as even the Pope does that. You probably think the Pope is sincerely following Christ too! Yeah, nothing here. You can respond back all you want, but I won't waste my time responding again. I won't even bother to delete your comments or ban you, but rather leave everything here, for historical reasons, so others can learn the difference between historical and hysterical. Those words sound similar phonetically but the meanings are vastly different!
That’s why I keep saying if religion was good for mankind they would have it buried so deep you would never know anything about it and if it came to the surface, they would call it a conspiracy theory
Where can I watch Part 2 of this conference? I couldn’t not agree with you more and I am finding it fascinating how you explain what I’ve been trying to say for so long.
My name is Dennis, and I only provide transcriptions of Mark Passio's work. I am NOT Mark. I add extra videos and brief commentary, and perhaps that is what you refer to? If so, I will be finishing part 2 probably later today. In the meantime, you can check out all three parts on Mark's website, whatonearthishappening.com
Check later today, and I should have part 2 done, with added videos/commentary!
Thank you for doing this Dennis!! Looking forward to watching part 2 with your commentary 🙏💜
I signed up for your substack. If you don't mind recommending my WTFOEIH substack on your own, that'd be great to help spread the word.
In the meantime, I see you list holography as an interest. I deal with lots of that on my other substack. Here is a recent post that deals with my ideas about simulation theory reality: https://www.writepharmaparablepublishing.com/p/preamble-post-re-the-run-up-to-my
I reference Rizwan Virk's book "The Simulation Hypothesis" as he's a great resource to show the idea is more true than most realize.
Thanks for signing up! I also subscribed to your substack and would be happy to recommend.
Checking out your other Substack now. 😉💜
Great. I finished part 2 and added lots of extra videos and such, that seemed to fit what Mark was talking about. Some are very long, but let me know what you think. Hope you enjoy my other substack too.
Just quickly scrolled through and saw lot’s of interesting content. Fully resonate with what you’re saying. Hope you enjoy my Substack too.
After keeping my distance from everyone, I formed an intuition that perhaps, mark passio is just another flawed human being who has some knowledge, but his knowledge is still full of holes, and I need to go far beyond him if I want to improve my life first and then try to improve the lives of others.
1. Most people who consumed hundreds of mark passio's episodes are still broken, lazy, and ineffective.
2. While I scanned his episodes, I noticed that he spends a lot of time on being angry and bashing others for being lazy, cowardly, or something and on talking about various housekeeping topics like upcoming events, ARK, and so on instead of covering new grounds.
3. Because he didn't value other people's time in his episodes, I ran out of time before he taught everything he wanted people to know.
He seems legit, but he's probably also stuck at a level of knowledge and a level of personal development.
It's difficult to find content creators who are legit and value other people's time by compressing their contents as much as possible into the least amount of materials.
I guess his entire contents could be condensed down to 30 20-minute episodes or less if I try.
He also lacks information on "real" personal capability development. He focused too much on the collective side which is very slow to change. Changing individual is a lot faster. This is why people are still ineffective after consuming hundreds of his episodes.
His major focus is to pressure audience into publishing contents about morality and natural law. However, he does that without turning audience into more effective human beings.
Perhaps, I should teach people how to move up to better positions in life in addition to morality and whatever natural law is. And, I shall do that very efficiently in the least amount of time before people run out of time.
In a warfare, positioning yourself matters. If you are stuck in north korea or gaza as a poor peasant, publishing contents probably won't help. Perhaps, you need to move to mexico, south korea, or USA first before starting the moral education. I'd tell people to first move up in life and entrench themselves in better positions.
In a warfare, you have to flow like water and move to better positions. In practice, that can look like having multiple international bank accounts and multiple international companies and multiple passports and having more than enough money to operate smoothly.
Mark passio just tells people to start the work now even if their position is terrible and unsustainable.
The problem is, the system won't allow you to "move up to better positions in life" unless you consistently violate morality and natural law. So, by the time you have money and leisure time to teach what you don't practice, nobody wants to. It just won't happen. The controllers manipulate their system well.
You can earn money morally....
The real difficulty is that it's difficult to launch a business into a stable orbit in the first place.
You can scam people, but scamming your way to wealth isn't exactly easy, either. I also wouldn't advocate scamming people.
And, you don't have to do immoral things to run a stable business. You don't even need to become very rich. You just need more than enough for stability.
Mike Adams, the founder of health ranger store, is a rich businessman who does moral education some of the times. He agrees with mark passio on morality. He didn't do anything immoral to become rich.
Becoming rich is mostly about hard work and being useful to others. Scamming your way to wealth isn't sustainable and isn't easy. The ruling class somehow pulled off the immoral art of wealth, but the evil way of earning money isn't easy, either.
The real difficulty here is in defeating laziness and becoming an effective human being. Show me a man who has done what he's supposed to do everyday for many years, and he cannot be broke. Such a man is a rarity nowadays. Once you overcome your own obvious flaws, becoming rich and kind of free is not that difficult. The real scarcity is in will power and intelligence. Very few people have will power and intelligence.
You think you can't become rich morally because you lack imagination and have limiting beliefs.
The controllers aren't perfect human beings who always maintain perfect control over everyone. They don't have total control. They don't control everything. The degree of control they possess is still impressive, but it isn't total or perfect. When you supposedly have 8~9 billion people on earth, it's impossible to maintain total control. That's why they are trying to reduce population.
The control system is patchy and jurisdictional and not fully integrated. It is imperfect and will remain so. The control system is also subject to change over time. It isn't an un-defeatable god-like being. Over time, it can become stronger or weaker.
The controllers are powerful, but they aren't as powerful as the conspiracy theorists think they are.
I'd say it's a matter of degrees, a sliding scale of immorality to become rich and successful. Mike Adams seems genuinely more decent than most, but he still must pay taxes to support the war machine or he would be in jail. He still must fund government repression of all with those taxes, while enjoying some more relative freedom/success from his hard work. I don't disparage his general decency or hard work, as he has done much more than most.
And I understand it, because we all feel that we must submit to theft at the barrel of a gun, but we rationalize that if we stay out of jail, we can do more to raise moral awareness about the wider issues. Nonetheless, we must do wrong to promote what is right, because current reality is less than ideal. Everybody must decide for themselves to what degree they choose to compromise, but we all compromise. Can the system ever meaningfully change under such conditions?
Good luck with trying to do moral education in a prison cell.
Why is being forced to pay tax at the threat of a gun point evil? I don't think it is evil.
This is just impractical and impossible. If you refuse to pay tax, you will be either imprisoned or "killed". You know they are willing to kill you to enforce the smallest man-made laws.
We need to fight the war spiritually by publishing contents.
We can't "yet" fight the war physically by not paying tax or by attacking police stations with any weapons we have at hand.
Mark passio is forced to pay tax. You are forced to pay tax. We all are forced to pay tax.
On the other hand, we are not voluntarily helping evildoers and are not initiating direct harm on other beings.
If we are gladly donating money to evildoers, that would be a different story.
What are you realistically going to do? Be imprisoned or killed this year? How does that help anyone?
Lots of people around mark passio told me to not have a job or run a business, or to not pay tax. None of that can be put in practice. That's why I decided to keep distance from them. Let's focus on what can be actually done sustainably.
Without practicality and sustainability, the movement will be killed in this century.
You prove my point. Rationalizing and justifying, according to our own understanding. The lazy person can do the same, and what right do we have to judge them then? Throwing rocks while living in a glass house?
No, it's not evil to give my money to an armed thug who confronts me in a dark alley. I turn over the money, to hopefully avoid getting harmed. That is not evil, just self-preservation, and doing what is practical and possible, for the situation. However, the thug uses those funds to now go do true evil, and although that is not my intent or desire, that is the practical reality and truth of the situation.
That's why the 1776 American revolution got physical, but the low state of awareness then (...and probably even more now...) guaranteed that it was just a matter of time before we got to this current point. Without massive awareness and MASS awareness and UNITY on the fundamentals of natural law (...like for example NOBODY has the right to steal and NOBODY should submit to it...) then it seems that it can only be practiced sporadically and haphazardly on an individual level, to the degree you want to put your safety in jeopardy.
Bottom-line: if nobody can think of a better system to replace the system, meaningful change will always be small and inconsistent.
Let's suppose that I sacrificed myself by not paying tax at all and perhaps even by attacking police stations.
What can I possibly achieve by doing these actions? The only thing I am going to achieve is to rot in prison or die without changing the collective side.
You can call it rationalizing and justifying.
This is why I decided to maintain distance from people around mark passio. At least, mark passio admitted that we are forced to pay tax in order to fight the war spiritually by publishing contents. People around mark passio are even less practical than mark passio. At least, mark passio had a minimal sense of practicality.
Mark passio often complains that people don't follow his lead. What makes you think people are going to be influenced by people around mark passio if the people around mark passio are even less practical than mark passio himself?
Nothing is not going anywhere until people admit impossible plans are indeed impossible.
We are not God who can afford to just do banzai attacks all day everyday without considering strategies. We are imperfect finite beings who can only make imperfect decisions.
I never fell for the New Age Movement. As a Christian it went against what I believed. Now I question a lot of things I was taught as a Christian. I trust Christ as the truth, I trust He cares for me, I trust He gives me wisdom to discern the Truth, I trust He is the creative essence that brings us all together, who are in Him (the creator truth).
Yes and Mark often talks about Jesus (...in a "disguised" way...) when he talks about serving the Truth. Anytime he says Truth, I sub in Jesus, who said He was the way, the Truth, and the life. I am not so literal on the Bible anymore, as I think in terms of parable, metaphor, allegory, symbols, archetypes, etc....
Esoteric interpretation always has personal application this way, to inwardly "drink the blood of Christ and eat His body" when you can apply metaphors to your own heart and inward experience. Outward exoteric "literalism" is often nonsensical and doesn't fit individual circumstances and situations. For example, does "turn the other cheek" make sense, when Epstein wants to rape, torture, murder my child in a Satanic ritual? Nah, the real God would want me to send such a person directly to Him, as quickly as possible, for proper judgement & correction. I would just introduce such a person to the true God and let the Lord do the rest. :-)
Here is David Icke himself (NOT known for Bible thumping), talking favorably about the God of the Bible, in esoteric terms: https://www.writepharmaparablepublishing.com/p/the-parable-of-david-icke-talking
https://substack.com/@adrianadorsett/note/p-187412660?r=24onvd&utm_medium=ios&utm_source=notes-share-action
I think we may be aligned. Please take a look at my writing. 🤚🏽
https://substack.com/@adrianadorsett/note/p-184025486?r=24onvd&utm_medium=ios&utm_source=notes-share-action
Please take a look at my writing. 🎉
https://www.facebook.com/share/v/1JuuGJoh5x/ This is what I mean.
The guy's video sounds confusing, as I'm not a financial scam expert. Is he your AI? It will still take time to do all this and it sounds scammy, intentionally confusing, to herd people.
Yes familiar with your work. I was watching you on YouTube back in 2013. Thank you.
Thanks, but I wasn't on youtube back in 2013. :-) As I mention in the main intro (https://substack.com/@whatonearthishappening), which you might NOT have read, I am NOT Mark Passio. I took his media seminar and decided to make his work more available to readers. My name is actually Dennis.
Welcome aboard!
Thank you Dennis. I appreciate that somehow I didn't see the complete title even though it's right there it may be my migraine issues. Dennis promoting... 🙏🏽🤔
Only Jesus can save….and its not the way you think.
NOTE: The person above deleted their own comment. I, Dennis, the creator of this substack did NOT delete their post. That person can be found at https://trustchristorgotohell.substack.com/ and the substack name explains everything. That person's initial comment was about how Mark Passio was still a "Satanist pig", but s/he had ZERO evidence for such claims and could not stand my challenge.
---START OF MY INITIAL RESPONSE---
I've learned that one can make that claim of ANYBODY and ALWAYS spin at least SOME evidence to make it appear that way. Here is a video debunking David Icke: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UyOf0NrA4ZM&t=1s and it's interesting. Some good points. I still listen to Icke and I'm even reading his latest book, "The Roadmap". I'm careful NOT to worship personalities or let my guard down 100%, with anybody, because the controllers are very tricky. And besides, we're ALL human and can be sincere but sincerely wrong!
So, bottom-line is: do you have a good case to make as to why Mark Passio is still a Satanist? If so, I'll willing to consider it. If not, then you are full of hot air. Most people just like to judge, make accusations with ZERO evidence, and then run away when challenged to prove their case. I suspect you are one of these.
I doubt that you can make as good a case against Mark as I did, from personal experience, in this post here: https://www.whatonearthishappening.wtf/p/what-on-earth-is-happening-with-mark. And yet I still digest Mark's material as cautiously as Icke's, taking what resonates as truth, as they both have a lot of truth, IMHO. And then I discard the rest. I also posted that critique about Mark in his own media telegram group, which all the other students saw, and Mark's friends like Will Keller, etc.... and yet Will was able to see past such and give me a compliment in this post: https://www.whatonearthishappening.wtf/p/will-kellers-book-recommendations
Stephana, from the above post, was also mature enough to be able to talk like an adult with me, in this video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9ZURAF_CUrs&t=1s and Stephana and I are mature enough to continue to be able to collaborate. In fact, we are planning to do a livestream next week and suggest you check out Stephana's promo link here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fx1m48d6oGg
So yeah, are you a mature adult about your accusation or just gonna run away?
NOTE: The person above deleted their own comment. I, Dennis, the creator of this substack did NOT delete their post. That person can be found at https://trustchristorgotohell.substack.com/ and the substack name says it all. That person's initial comment was about how Mark Passio was still a "Satanist pig", but s/he had ZERO evidence for such claims and could not stand my challenge. I had intended to leave the comment for historical reasons.
---START OF MY SUBSEQUENT RESPONSE---
Uh-huh, like I thought, ZERO evidence from personal experience with Mark, unlike my post where I interacted with Mark personally and had honest criticism. You probably didn't even check out those posts, as quick judgers like to wing it and free style, since they have NOTHING, except vague symbolism accusations. You obviously don't understand how flexible symbolism is, and in a duality realm, even negative symbolism can be inverted in positive ways, in light occultism fashion, because intentions behind things is important. I'm sure you can read Mark's mind and know his intentions!
Anybody can throw around phrases like repent and trust Christ, etc... as even the Pope does that. You probably think the Pope is sincerely following Christ too! Yeah, nothing here. You can respond back all you want, but I won't waste my time responding again. I won't even bother to delete your comments or ban you, but rather leave everything here, for historical reasons, so others can learn the difference between historical and hysterical. Those words sound similar phonetically but the meanings are vastly different!