I joined Stephana & Ryder today, in discussing Mark Passioβs work. Click button below for my other site re: my derivative substack, based on Markβs work.
I have been including Stephana & Ryderβs commentary into my transcriptions of Markβs podcast series; click HERE to jump right to their very first video!
We agreed Markβs presentation style can be rather intense and/or negative; he freely admits this before every formal presentation. I can usually look beyond it, focusing instead on the truth(s) revealedβ¦β¦but it can even bog me down sometimes.
I think Mark is definitely a polarizing figure. He has a lot of really good foundational stuff, but he can lean hard into the βus versus themβ energy, which can feel like a black pill if youβre not ready for it. Iβm not sure if heβs βintentionallyβ controlled opposition (β¦or perhaps his energy βaccidentallyβ pushes people away from the truth he bringsβ¦), but I do think he attracts a certain type of energy that can be intense.
We decided to take a break from coordinating the podcast transcriptions, for now anyway.
Questions to my readers:
Do you agree that Markβs work and/or presentation style is too difficult to process sometimes?
Does everybody feel a need to take a break from Passio-style information & communication sometimes, or is it just us???
Please feel free to leave comments regarding this dilemma, and also Professor Jiangβs rationalizations & justifications below.
Professor Jiang usually seems pretty smart, but is he totally correct, in the video below?
He claims that the masses NEED to be programmed with ideas about right and wrong & truth and justice, OR ELSE society would collapse into chaos! I think that Mark would say the good professor is under mind control. Or, does Prof Jiang make good points?
Is Jiang a victim of chaos sorcery mind control AND worldview poisoning mind control? Does the professor buy into the βauthority programβ too much, as a good and necessary thing? He does seem to understand (as Mark emphasizes too) that fear of abandonment by tribe (ie symbolically, the alpha male father figure) is the deepest subconscious fear that people have.
But how to leverage that realization to its fullest extent? Perhaps Jiangβs recommendations are simply a stepping stone to something deeper that Originator-Creator-Oversoul has for Sophia?
Can we truly reprogram ourselves in 30 days, following the professorβs plan below?
Pause moral judgment with narratives (week 1).
Stop asking whoβs right and start asking how systems function (week 2).
Detach identity from belief (week 3).
Argue opposite views even if you donβt believe them at first???
Practice strategic silence (week 4).1
Anchor tag jump point



